1. whether Gandhiji's policy of non-violence advocated to the British would apply to the Russians also, or would it need any modification;

2. whether Gandhiji was satisfied with the progress of non-cooperation;

3. how many of his followers really believed in non-violence;

4. whether in view of the widespread rioting in the country, India could still have the unity and strength to forge her own destiny. Gandhiji had launched in October 1940, on behalf of Congress, limited satyagraha by individuals from lists approved by him.]

Dear Mr. Stimson,
Here are my answers:

1. No modification necessary. My advice to the Russians would be precisely the same as to the British. It is cruel misrepresentation of my advice to the British to say that it was one of non-resistance. I suggested non-violent resistance which is any day superior to violent, blood-thirsty resistance.

2. I am entirely satisfied with the progress and achievements of my limited non-cooperation campaign as you call it and which I describe as civil disobedience.

3. It is a difficult question to answer definitely. But I do not mind it being said that the majority are non-violent only out of policy. That is the weakest part of my campaign but it is inevitable. In spite of the appearances to the contrary it is my belief that true non-violence is growing among the people.

4. I have no doubt whatsoever that in spite of the riots, etc., India will have the moral strength and unity to forge her own destiny in her own way. Twenty years of solid work cannot be a waste. I hope you can decipher my writing and that if you publish my reply, it will be published as it is, in to

Yours sincerely,
M. K. Gandhi